IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-02.txt

Dan Drown <dan-v6ops@drown.org> Sun, 22 April 2012 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <dan-v6ops@drown.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADCE21F84E1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.36
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.36 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fgY-LmSVxxai for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vps3.drown.org (vps3.drown.org [IPv6:2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fedf:5654]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C4721F84CF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vps3.drown.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 22554C16E; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 20:20:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 2001:470:b88f:c8f6:f56f:33a4:de08:afe7 ([2001:470:b88f:c8f6:f56f:33a4:de08:afe7]) by mail.drown.org (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:20:46 -0500
Message-ID: <20120421192046.99723kgkv9zjcq9w@mail.drown.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:20:46 -0500
From: Dan Drown <dan-v6ops@drown.org>
To: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>, v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <20120417065542.31115.95082.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20120417160010kawashimam@mail.jp.nec.com> <56E2AD61-1C91-4889-914A-353793FCBE43@laposte.net> <20120419121044.17531mk1mv19abr4@mail.drown.org> <0646611B-5594-40EA-A2C4-F99CBA734024@laposte.net> <20120419181813.4524701l3gkq5zks@mail.drown.org> <45ABAD31-C265-4D63-82E2-3DE6F59B80C0@laposte.net> <20120420104246.1432746csfcrdqo8@mail.drown.org> <FDDCBB86-D800-4084-9178-9DB789250CF6@laposte.net> <20120420122715.1702279xh7eynpus@mail.drown.org> <C0EFAAB5-D48B-496D-9A18-9FF51139C8DF@laposte.net> <20120420175036.70482p5axgf81lq8@mail.drown.org> <2950A57B-DA87-4641-8540-8972F5C437CF@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <2950A57B-DA87-4641-8540-8972F5C437CF@laposte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.9)
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 00:20:51 -0000

Quoting Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>:
> Now, avoiding ND proxy on two addresses REMAINS POSSIBLE.
> - It is sufficient that a CLAT interface ID be reserved by IETF/IANA  
> (an ID that no host may legitimately use).
> - This can be done, in compliance with RFC 5342, with a  
> modified-EUI-64 ID based on IANA's OUI.
> - Proposed ID value is 02-00-5E-10--00-00-00-00 (in the available  
> range of www.iana.org/assignments/ethernet-numbers for this).
...
> Would you agree on this?

This sounds good to me.  Using IANA's EUI-64 ID would avoid conflicts  
with possible interface IDs on v6 tethering (as long as a unique  
EUI-64 address is assigned to clat).  Since this is just a config file  
change, I'll go ahead and use it.

Thank you,
Dan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email